>>"The Republicans have been more than conspicuously absent from this entire mess."
Publicly perhaps.
Interesting response to something I never said, though that first statement appears to be true. What also appears to be true is that you are either hallucinating or need more time to sleep it off. Halfscot, not I, wrote that first statement and his is the post that you should have responded to:
exchange2000.com
The post that you actually responded to was:
exchange2000.com
where I stated
That Bill Clinton, (if one ever existed), was a casualty of the Vietnam war.
Vietnam War. Your strange responses may lead some to suspect that you may not be a Canadian by birth, but rather by choice, as perhaps an expatriate draft avoiding soulmate of Clinton? Or maybe just an intimate with one who was. What would otherwise explain your interest in and affinity for Clinton as demonstrated by your willful blindness and logically untenable position concerning the matters at hand?
Canadian by birth or not, draft avoiding U.S. expatriate or not, it's all just speculation regarding the grounding, if any, for your views. But no one can simply defend the demeaning of the U.S. by Clinton & Co. as much as you appear to be doing without a cause, no matter how unreasonable it may be.
Just my opinion, of course. |
