SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan who wrote (10638)3/15/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) of 20981
 
Today's Washington Post editorial on Jones v. Clinton

......Summary judgment is designed for
that situation in which, no matter how generously the facts are read in one
party's favor, that party still cannot win the case under the law. Mr.
Clinton's motion highlights serious deficiencies in Ms. Jones's case --
though it badly fails to address the ethical questions raised about the
president by her suit. It does, in our view, leave room for her to convince a
reasonable jury that Mr. Clinton broke the law by sexually harassing her
and, thereby, discriminating against her. Enough of the material in the Jones
brief raises questions about the president's credibility and the pattern of his
past behavior that the judge can't be sure. Putting all of the distasteful
atmospherics aside, this means that Paula Jones should have her day in
court.
washingtonpost.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News