Rillinois: You are too good to me!
Re: "Prior to
Sunday's show, my contention has always been that Bob frequently "conveyed a
false image or impression" that he recommended sale of NEW ASIA because of the
impending Asian crisis. (See post # 3763)"
No way. You called him a "flat out" liar on this issue. So does "flat out" liar mean that he may have left a "false impression." That is not what you meant the first time around and I doubt it is what you mean now. Your meaning was clear then as it is now. The dictionary did not save you then and it is doing nothing for you now. Nice baseline spin move but your shot was blocked. You continue to hide behind a thin veil of respect for Brinker.
Re:"In fact, Justa Werkenstiff confirmed three
distinct times on this thread that Brinker had left a false impression with him
regarding the sale of NEW ASIA."
Nice spin move again citing one of your interpretations of my post to support your proposition that I agree with you. I have never agreed with you on this point. That is the "fact." You just can't figure out why I disagree can you? In the future, you can assume that I do not agree with you on anything unless I come out and say so explicitly and mention your name.
In trying to drag me into your camp on the New Asia issue, you assume that one can only have the opinion that Brinker is a "flat out" liar (you pick your meaning of the day for the word "lie") or that he has told the absolute truth affirmatively leaving no doubt and covering every possible misperception on the part of so-called radio listeners. But the story may not not always so clear cut as to be black and white as it has to be to in your mind. And I will give Brinker the benefit of the doubt over you every day of the week. He has earned my respect; you are still at ground zero and fading.
Let's take an incident from your life to drive this point home.
I hear that people on the AOL thread over on have consistently referred to Rillinois with the male pronoun. In fact, I have done the same with all my posts here. And we all know how Rillinois is interested in truth, justice and the American way. Why one need only go to every thread on the internet to view your efforts to set the matter straight on Brinker. See:
Message 3672876
And I am sure if one was not addressing him correctly as to his sex he would be in our faces in a heartbeat here as well as on AOL. But it has never happened. What a noble fellow Rillinois is, or is he? I find it very interesting that the profile on AOL for Rillinois as reported to me has you listed as a 27 year old female. Oh, no could it be time for another trip to the dictionary? Rillinois is thinking: how can I be both a male and female so as to retain any credibility on this thread? I don't think the dictionary is going to help you here. Should I conclude then that you are a "flat out" liar in intentionally leaving the impression with all of us that you are in fact a male when your profile says you are a female? Sure, why not -- that is the name of your game.
But I have an open mind. I think you are being very honest with everyone on this thread and let me be the first to tell you so <g>. So I have to leave open the posibility that you are a man when you post to this thread but a female when do anything else in your life. Does the dictionary have the word "crossdresser" yet? Or, then again, maybe you have had a sex change operation and forgot to change your profile on AOL. Or maybe being a female allows you unfettered access to other internet boards where you otherwise may not be welcome. Or maybe it is something else. But since you are from Illinois one cannot discount the possibility that you are a disgruntled Beardstown Illinois lady who is jealous of Brinker's performance in light of the exposure of the overstatement of your club's results. Why if you were not a Beardstown lady, you would be on this thread calling those poor little old ladies "flat out" liars as well. So that must be the truth. Well, Rillinois, if Brinker has come clean in your eyes will you do the same with this thread? How can you live with yourself if you do not and we have to conclude that Brinker is a better man than you? My, my how will your ego handle this situation?
I am still waiting for your spin on this post:
Message 3677154
Did you mean that UTEK investors were "pathetic" "losers" who are "suckers" or do we have to go to the dictionary again? Now on your most recent post you are calling some on this thread "SPIN DOCTORS." But I thought you were above ad hominem attacks? Oh I am so confused. Help me see the light of your ways oh wise one.
And we are still awaiting response on your UNPH post:
Message 3707213
Message 3708700
Put you gravity boots on everyone and get ready for some serious spin! |
