And for you Campbell, I need only to reply once for each two scurrilous postings you make to me. You're close to being beyond help. In your case, you'll need to take two pills, one for each side of the brain. Chanting won't work for you. And if the pills don't work, seek help from Ally McBeal's doctor. I hear she's pretty good.
>>You madame, had use every kind of deception, starting from your first post disguising yourself as some innocent small investor with very little knowledge of the market.From the outset, I identified myself as a long term investor and supporter of this company. So has
Bonnie, Mark B, Tj and others. I expect in the coming weeks, your predicament will become an avalanche, maybe the wine would be unaffordable<<.
Talking about deception. Here's your first posting to me:
>>I always advise my clients that after they are satisfied with the results of their investigative work, a good entry point would be when the stock is beginning to consolidate<<
Then when I asked you whether you're a broker, you first didn't answer. Then after I said "brokers should fess up", you then said:
>>For your information, I am not a broker. I only use the word 'client' to flush you out. And I think I was quite successful at it<<
Mmmmm... you either deceiving us, or you're breaking the law, giving investment advice when you're not a broker. WHICH CAMPBELL?
And, as for trying to flush me out by using the word client, you seem to suffer yet another ailment. What's there to flush anyone out on this thread?. This is a game of different points of views. Not cops and robbers!
Here, take this yellow little jagged pill. It should help!
>>I just spent some time doing a simple excerise this am and went back to read the past postings on this thread, all the way back to 300. By now it must be obvious to everyone where each poster's true interests are in this stock. One thing stands very clear, the growing anxiety of the shorters.Including the writer who profess to be doing only due diligence with no other interests; she wrote 12 lengthy postings filled with negative innuendoes all week long. Starting with innocent inquiries and progressing to baseless assumptions. I can't imagine anyone spending this amount of time and work without any financial interests<<
What a lousy analysis!
First: your final conclusion is wrong. I'm not short on this stock.
Second: you didn't check the timing of my postings, to the stock price. The stock was at its high and had fallen the next day, when I started on this thread. So, I couldn't have shorted the stock... I was already too late.
Third: The investment universe for this stock does not depend on what happen at SI. So unless you're filthy rich and has a substantial holding in this stock which has a 24 million float, what you and others here do with your stocks, will have little impact to the real world.
Forth: You concluded from the questions I asked and my comments during the time I was a newbie on this thread as trying to be deceptive. The fact that I got smart once I'm up to speed, for you it means I was trying to deceive in the beginning. CAMPBELL, PEOPLE GET SMART AFTER THEY'VE LEARNED(well for some people). And when they are smart, one don't look back and conclude they were being deceptive at the beginning! If this is your theory, then all smart people are deceptive people.
Fifth: It is not unusual that people who have a bearish view on the stock will continually post in a bearish fashion. You are bullish on this stock. Have you ever once posted a bearish view? Did anyone analyze your past postings and concluded that you're being deceptive because the postings were all bullish?
Sixth: Some people do spend time on a thread even though they may not have a position. They don't have to have a position to spend time on a thread. They could be learning. They could be waiting. They could be entertained. They could be lost! See?
Seventh: You must be drinking cheap wine, cause 'the rest of your sentences don't make sense.
>>Thank you Mark. I myself felt that this person's baseless muttering does not warrant a serious answer. I have questioned her motives for a while. But you said it very well<<.
>>Hi, Sechelt. You're not trying to pick up some cheap ATF shares at the last mintes of this week, are you?<<
Here, Campbell, take this other purple jagged little pill. I hear it helps to clear paranoia as well as haziness from bad wine.
>> I do have a very strong group of investors supporting this and many
other great companies<<
If they're taking your advice, they'll need all the luck they can get.
d. |
