SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (13775)4/17/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: DScottD1 Recommendation  Read Replies (4) of 20981
 
>>But my point is you can't have it both ways. You can't defend Bubba by claiming its not proven in a Court of law while denying his accusers the same deference.<<

There's a big difference. Bubba doesn't have to prove he didn't do it; his accusers have to prove he did do it. And who's defending Bubba anyway? He's innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. He's not civilly liable until PJ shows he is by a preponderance of the evidence. All we so-called Clintonistas want is to see the system work the way it was intended.

I'm no apologist for the man but I have too much respect for his position and the Constitution to tolerate much more of this witch hunt.

I say we use the dunk test on both of them. The one who floats has no soul and is obviously aligned with the Devil and must therefore be put to death. The one telling the truth will sink and be posthumously vindicated.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News