Funny that he exposed himself to possible legal sanction by now saying the opposite, ain't it? Maybe he has a conscience.
In the law, that would be a "declaration against interest" and be considered highly persuasive.
Only counts, I should think, if one says it under oath. And no, I'm afraid I have not helped you make your point. Your point was that Morris had never told a different story. Wrong, as you would say.
That's when you liked him - when he was a good little Clintonista. It may well be that he lied to Congress when he was in league with the Clintons.
Liked him? When have I ever said I liked him? I always thought he was an untrustworthy slimebag.
Another point, Zlot: you keep saying that Clinton governs by polling results, as if there were something dramatically new in that. If ever we had a president who specialized in telling people only what they wanted to hear it was Your Hero, Ronald Reagan. He promised to lower taxes and simultaneously increase defense spending; he sided with the right-to-lifers when I daresay he could have cared less about abortion; he sucked up to religious leaders when as far as can be known he had no religious beliefs; he talked sanctimoniously about Family when his own was a dysfunctional disaster; he encouraged the nation to believe that it was Morning In America, and that We Were Number One, and a lot of other unrealistic and chauvinistic nonsense.
Much, much more the Feel-Good Prez than Clinton. |
