SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DMaA who wrote (15784)6/9/1998 12:59:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) of 20981
 
I don't think they asserted 5th Amendment rights. I think it is limited solely to attorney-client privilege. The privilege is based upon the notion that it is important for a client to be able to speak freely with his lawyer. The tobacco case someone raised is probably not apposite to this case. In the tobacco case I understand that the lawyers were actually (allegedly) involved in the illegal conspiracy. In that case, the Court would not protect those conversations for obvious reasons. JLA
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News