SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Carter Patterson who wrote (2711)6/30/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: shoe  Read Replies (2) of 11568
 
I think it behooves use to take a closer look at Forbes article "Grand illusions" in the July 6 issue (couldn't find it on the web site).

I agree that MCI's customer base is important, but if phone service is a commodity product, Qwest et. al. can make inroads on MCI's market share just as MCI did on AT&T's.

Some quotes from the article:

Worldcom's bid was a rich 3.3 times MCI's $11 billion book value....Ebbers is buying a stumbling hulk of a company that lost its way since founder McGowan developed heart disease in the late 1980s....Roberts and Taylor have spent close to $10 billion...on ventures like local service, on-line movies and news, which now contribute little to the bottom line. MCI's return on capital peaked in 1989 at 18% and has since tanked to 1.1%.

real crux of the problem: 3/4ths of MCI's $20 billion in revenues last year came from plain old voice calls, over a circuit switched network second in age only to AT&T's.

[MCI's avg. charge is 12.5 cents a minute vs. Qwest's 7.5 cents. 7.5 cents applied to MCI's call volume would reduce MCI's phone revenues from $15 to $9 billion.] ...But if Ebbers gets MCI, some 65% of revenues will suddenly come from old-fashioned phone calls. [maybe internet traffic will compensate?]

[Packet-switching is the technology of the future. Sprint put its obsolete circuit-switching equipment on the scrap heap.]

[Cost for MCI to shift to a Sprint-like network will be enormous and disruptive to customers. Sprint spent $2 billion over 5 years to install a high capacity packet network. MCI will have to replace its plant quickly to keep up with competition. For example, AT&T took a $7 billion write-down in 1988 to digitize its network.]

Worldcom was one of the first carriers to deploy dense wave-length division multiplexing that greatly increases the amount of traffic an existing fiber-optic cable can carry. [WCOM and Sprint funded development of same at Ciena.] In May, Worldcom announced it would delay a $45 million order from Ciena, at the same time Sprint is boosting its Ciena orders.

...How will Ebbers come up with the rosy $12 billion cash flow he has led securities analysts to expect from the merger? etc. etc.

Your comments?

Thanks
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext