SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nemer who wrote (1354)7/8/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: Patrick Slevin  Read Replies (1) of 44573
 
RE:
......1) potential loss was set according to support level forecast
......2) potential profit was let to run according to the movable #1
......3) short term positions could turn into long term positions only by usage of above 2 rules.

I concur with the concept of allowing profits to run. Too often on SI I see where people prefer to set a daily "winnings" target or a certain price level in the instrument where they take profits and quit.

I imagine it works for people depending on personality but for me I am more concerned with preservation of capital than limiting upside.

That is to say, if I have a thousand dollar profit I won't take it just because it's a magic number. I'd rather convince myself that a thousand is all I'm going to get out of the trade.

In some ways I have a target but don't restrict myself to the high end. For example, if my weekly target is 40 bucks and by Tuesday I made 50; but on Thursday I see a trade I like I will risk no more than 10 bucks on the trade. It would probably seem demoralizing to know I was ahead on Tuesday and now have to go into Friday short of my goal.

Anyway, the long and the short of it is Risk Management; not Upside Limitation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext