SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Adaptec (ADPT)
ADPT 16.24-1.1%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cris who wrote (3019)7/19/1998 4:36:00 AM
From: Torben Noerup Nielsen  Read Replies (2) of 5944
 
Chris,

>While this is certainly true for servers, the story is less
>compelling for desktop systems. SCSI drives do tend to be faster,
>but that's a drive attribute and not an interface attribute.
>Regarding CPU utilization, if your application is blocked waiting
>for data from disk, it really doesn't matter whether the CPU is in
>the driver or making trips around the idle loop - you aren't getting
>anything done.

Unless you are running DOS or another truly single-tasking system, this is just not true. In a system with any kind og multi-tasking, the CPU is perfactly able to do useful work while the disk controller is transferring data from the drive to memory.

Also, I had an amusing experience. I have two machines in my office right now. At one end is a 300 MHz system with an Adaptec SCSI controller and a fast SCSI disk. At the other end is a 400 MHz system with a UDMA disk on it. Both have 24X CD-ROM drives. They systems are otherwise identical (actually, the 400 MHz system has an advantage since it has the new fast memory). I recently upgraded both to Windows 98. And the winnner was: the old 300 MHz system with the SCSI drive. Across the board it appears a lot faster. Except for playing DVD movies since the new system has hardware for that :-)

Cheers, Torben

P.S. I'm not trying to start an argument; I'm just reporting what I actually saw.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext