SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Adaptec (ADPT)
An SI Board Since December 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5944 43 0 ADPT
Emcee:  Tom Koutsky Type:  Unmoderated
I think Adaptec (ADPT) is well-positioned to have a bang-up 1996. Here are my reasons -- 1) SCSI, with its multithreading capability and greater capacity for expansion, is poised to surpass EIDE. 2) ADPT is the dominant maker of SCSI adapters. No danger of commodification here -- they own the patents. 3) Peripherals (like IOMEGA's ZIP drive) will continue to proliferate. More and more computer owners will realize that the best way to accomodate this proliferation is through SCSI. Any thoughts or reactions? Please post here...
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5944Adaptec: R.I.P. networkcomputing.com On June 9, Adaptec Inc. announced it'sJakeStraw-6/15/2010
5943Has anybody evaluated this Steel Partners offer?The Philosopher110/17/2009
5942Yeah, nobody puts out a 2am "retirement" notice and leaves immediatelyJim Switz-5/27/2005
5941Jim, you got it. He was fired but, as usual, they are polishing a turd by cloakStarowl-5/27/2005
5940You know what they say -- when you can't say something nice, don't say aThe Philosopher-5/26/2005
5939<b>Bob Stephens <u>finally</u> got fired!</b> Sure, theJim Switz-5/26/2005
5938I didn't have a choice -- they bought our company. I sold about 75% of my hThe Philosopher-12/22/2004
5937Christopher, Adaptec for me was an "I fall in love too easily, I fall in lStarowl-12/22/2004
5936<i>Well, maybe its not that bad. It still has some big institutional invesThe Philosopher-12/22/2004
5935Yes, indeed. Adaptec appears still not to have found an answer to its very longStarowl-12/22/2004
5934<i>Just a quick message to keep this poor thread on life support</i>The Philosopher-12/21/2004
5933Merry Christmas, everyone! Hello? Hello? Testing . . . . Just a quick messaJim Switz-12/21/2004
5932Well, I'm sure you'd have felt better off waiting at least 3 days to selJim Switz-1/17/2004
5931I closed out a year-old position today at 9.02 (b 12/23/02 @ 5.47). I thought izax-12/29/2003
5930No. There's no reason at all to jump in. I am hanging on to my remaining sThe Philosopher-12/20/2003
5929Same to you, SO. Man, sure has been some pent-up posting demand here, huh? AllJim Switz-12/20/2003
5928Well, well, well. Hello to Jim and Christopher. One a Libertarian and the otheStarowl-12/20/2003
5927I am not a robot. I am not a robot. I am not a robot. No, you actually happenThe Philosopher-12/19/2003
5926Chris, I'm stunned. I haven't poked my head in here since about Spring,Jim Switz-12/19/2003
5925Long time no hear from. Yes, ADPT has been languishing, but at least it's nThe Philosopher-12/19/2003
5924Well, I suppose we can't let 2003 head off into history with zero postings tJim Switz-12/19/2003
5923Fortunately I also unloaded a bunch then. Unfortunately, not all.The Philosopher-7/17/2002
5922Too bad about Adaptec. Remember when it topped $60/share? That's when all Starowl-7/17/2002
5921Sounds interesting, but I generally don't invest in companies with fewer thaThe Philosopher-7/17/2002
5920Hi, Christopher. I'll look into MINI, thanks. I have been adding to my holStarowl-7/17/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):