nhaynes:
Thanks for your thoughful post.
Looks like we have another poster with an agenda regarding this stock.
I think you are confusing having a little bit of insight with having an agenda.
John, your links are passe and most go back to old management days
In the referenced post, I think that only one link that I have posted go back to the old management days. The information that is contained there is important and relevant. For instance, if you read the following post, Message 227984
you never would have made the following factually incorrect statement:
Mike Redden and Dave Larson became management in June of 1997
You see, in the referenced post, there is a press release which contains the following information:
SARASOTA, FLA. (July 16) BUSINESS WIRE -July 16, 1996--NVID
International Inc. (OTC BB:NVID) announced Tuesday the appointment of David J. Larson as vice president of sales for their subsidiary, Aqua Bio Technologies Inc.
So it isn't June of 1997 that Mr. Larson was appointed to the management of NVID, but about a year earlier, in July 1996, when he was made a vice president of the company. Please realize that I'm not trying to imply that he was one of the perpetrators of the fraud, or that he is currently perpetrating a fraud. In fact, it is to his credit, he is not mentioned in either of the SEC litigation releases, and was never charged with anything.
sec.gov sec.gov
Can you please explain what you meant by (from inception, to prosecution to ???) The ??? please
No problemo, just think of the ???'s sort of like "X the unknown" from algebra. ??? was meant to represent the unknown future, of NVID and the perpetrators of the scam. Is the company going to die, or thrive, will there be civil actions, or further SEC actions? Anyway you look at it, the NVID story isn't over.
then made a request of K. A. Anderson to post your comment to the SEC thread and let you know their response
You misunderstood my comment to K.A. Anderson, I wasn't asking that K.A. post MY comment to the "SEC Raises its ugly head" thread, I was suggesting that she post HER comment (namely Well personally I would like to see the SEC raise its head more often if it takes some of these fraudulant OTC companies off the market) to that thread. My was a joke (notice the smiley emoticon at the end of the sentence), and from K.A.'s response (i.e., LMAO) she understood it as such. If I had wanted to post MY comment to the SEC thread, I would have done it myself.
I do not recall seeing many Canadians post to SI, and I have read thousand and thousands of posts.
There are many Canadian's posting to SI - heck theres even a whole section (with a couple hundred threads) on SI devoted entirely to Canadian stocks.
Besides, maybe you were reading a post from a Canadian and never realized it, eh? Many Canadians dress and talk a lot like American's, so we might be hard to recognize at first. If you can't tell from the content, I would suggest looking at spelling as the next best guide to determining if you're talking to a Canadian. If you see the unusual spelling differences, such as the following examples, you might be talking to a Canadian:
Color => Colour
Center => Centre
Meter, Liter => Metre, Litre
Washington DC => Ottawa, Ontario
Budweiser => Molson Ex
The SI spell checker can't tell I'm Canadian either, and marks the correct Canadian spellings as incorrect so every time I post, my preview message is covered with red ink.
... This all just looked rather odd to me ... Being a Canadian citizen might be the reason
Well being a Canadian, I guess I've grown used to being sort of odd. Don't you know that us Canadian's have gained an international reputation as being trouble makers.
You have not posted but a few posts to this thread (last September) and all of a sudden you have taken such an interest in NVID.
I did post to this thread in September (11 months ago), and I have been lurking on this thread since just after post 390 or so. Either way, it is a pretty long time, so I don't think that it is correct to asess my interest as "sudden". My reason for posting is pretty obvious if you look at my post - I thought that I saw a Pump and Dump, and thought that I would tell everybody. Nothing odd about that, IMO.
My question to you is why do you think that there are so many people who have never heard of NVID before, who are suddenly interested in the company? I think that's IS odd.
Are you a Canadian broker?
You mean an unscrupulous illegally short-selling Canadian broker don't you :-) Nope - I'm an Electrical Engineer.
BTW, in Canada, we prefer to speculate in TSE, VSE or ASE listed penny mining stocks rather than OTC issues - the OTC issues are just too hard to buy. But it doesn't matter, there's a long history of manipulation of the penny mining stocks - so there's just as much action, and just as much fraud as the OTC issues. After BRE-X (where Canada won the stock fraud world championships) everybody should realize that a mine is just a hole in the ground with a liar standing at the top.
Regards,
John Sladek |
