To Anyone...A REAL Challenge!! We'll See....
As For the Picture...
A picture tells a thousand words. None of the words this picture tells does the job it needs to do. If the picture is a response to skeptical investors why is it so vague and ambiguous in its meaning? This stock has a lot of potential, but the weak link is the Belize business. Which should rightly cause concern about this company as a whole. That picture is disappointing. Many companies are involved in building, contractors, developers, banks, government, etc... He set up a publicity shot for the sake of easing investors minds with no thought put into the pictures final outcome? If this is John et al and it is on the up and up I conclude he fumbled on this picture. It could have been so much more. I hope there are more explanatory pictures. After all this pic we see is not even supposed to be seen by us. There could be a lot more at the photo-shop that do a better job than this. But if not, TOO BAD.
De Facto v De Jure
He has paperwork signed by the government of Belize if legit. Post that. Any contract/ document/ government order added to the pictures and some sort of official statement from John and the Belize government would go a long way. I would put my life savings in PRWT if that happened. Well, maybe not that much, but the point is credibility is what we crave. The Belize "release" destroys his. Veracity notwithstanding. Again, I hope it isn't a big scam but until we hear definitively all of your Overtly Super Positive Comments are not warranted. The best you could respond to a post like mine is... "We'll See..." Not the robust incredulous un ethical hyping "sell the rolex, buy PRWT" posts You give in response. Regardless of the truth, PRWT must take the proper, ADEQUATE measures in response.
I am basically saying the same thing everybody else should be saying. I am analyzing what is out there critically. Skeptically. But, something more definitive needs to come from the company. Until it does... and only when it does should criticism be un justified. Until then the "promise" of verification is just not enough.
A Challenge to all those so positive...
I have seen the patents for the video phone. A patent does not a company make. I have seen alot of D.D. on this company, most is on this message board. Or, it is alluded to on this message board. I will tell you what I haven't seen yet! A post that un-emotionally non-prophetically states all the D.D. that can be verified and how. It would not include any guess work or conjecture about who owns how many shares... etc. Isomans post is good but still skewed. Isomans technique is sound though. If one set out to look through all these posts... some 8500 posts.. and set out posted drafts that would include lines like "Ok, what have I left out, what needs to be changed" The final product I would Put at the end of every subsequent post I make! As should you. AND, I will significantly tone done my remarks to try and mirror that of the un-emotional non-partisan post. That *is* a challenge.
The very process of doing so on the message board might seem as hype but that's ok. The super believers get something (post after post talking about legitimate D.D. on the company) and I get something. A final post that states factually and non-partisanly everything about the company and lets the investor decide.
My guess... it won't happen, your support is paper thin. I will go on criticizing until satisfied and You will go on supporting with blind faith in the face of obvious unresolved problems.
We'll See.....
|
