>You're telling
me that you want to indict the president for perjury in a case that doesn't exists?
Damn right I do. Perjury is perjury, whether the case is dismissed or not. Are you counter-suggesting, assuming arguendo that Clinton did purjure himself, that it's okay for the chief executive officer of the country, an officer of the court, the person responsible for the Department of Justice, and, by the way, the person with his finger on the nuclear trigger, to perjure himself as long as his lawyers can get the case dismissed eventually? Do you really want to make that argument?
>>Who among you hasn't lied about sex?
Frankly, my dear, I haven't. But more the point, who among us hasn't perjured himself about sex? I, for one, haven't. Have you? Would you???
|
