SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PSFT - Fiscal 1998 - Discussion for the next year
PSFT 0.00010000.0%Oct 29 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David W. Ricker who wrote (1642)7/28/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (4) of 4509
 
David, I agree with most of what you said. Right now I think we're dealing with a growth perception issue. We were told to expect PSFT growing at roughly 60% per annum going forward rather than the 70% to which we had become accustomed. Apparently companies are putting off installing ERP solutions in favor of quick fixes for the y2k problem. But this cloud has a silver lining. Administrative support for rapidly growing companies can be a real problem. Somewhat more deliberate growth rates can alleviate some of those infrastructural problems. I also have to believe that the corporate buyers are simply delaying the inevitable purchase of software, so we may see a resumption of hypergrowth (not that 60% is anything to sneeze at) in a year or so.

I am conservatively estimating earnings at roughly $.84 for the next four quarters, which yields a forward P/E of around 46. This is a considerable discount to the market. PSFTs PEG would be .77 compared to the PEG of the S&P500 of around 2.7.

I have come up with a metric normalizing PEGs with respect to the market called CNPEG (Chuzzlewit's Normalized PEG) wherein you divide the PEG of the stock by the PEG for the market. This yields a CNPEG of around 0.3. That tells me that in relation to the rest of the market PSFT is a screaming buy.

TTFN,
CTC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext