SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PSFT - Fiscal 1998 - Discussion for the next year
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4509 28 0 PSFT
Emcee:  Raptor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Ok, gang ... here is a new thread to start off the new year

Let's see if it flies - i.e. switch over to the new thread
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4509 See post #4505 - this thread closed; see 1999 thread Raptor-2/23/1999
4508 MACD crossed and generated a BUY signal today, so is SAR. FYI. Chart follows Will Hou-2/23/1999
4507 Accounting for "in process R&D" and the SEC: exchange2000.com CChuzzlewit-2/11/1999
4506 HEY!!! I'm not welcome here?!?!?! WELL!!!!! (*Mock disappointment *) I Joanna Tsang-2/1/1999
4505 THIS THREAD IS CLOSED - 1998 FISCAL YEAR IS OVER -- SEE NEW THREAD: techstocksRaptor-1/31/1999
4504 THIS THREAD IS CLOSED - 1998 FISCAL YEAR IS OVER -- SEE NEW THREAD: techstocksRaptor-1/31/1999
4503 OK thanks Bob. Either way this looks like a pretty good investment at these levMighty Mizzou-1/31/1999
4502 >>This letter was posted earlier on Yahoo. Can anyone give a reasonable AlienTech-1/31/1999
4501 I agree with you that psft mgmt is above board and I really doubt there is any Lizzie Tudor-1/31/1999
4500 Andrew, there are two classes of shares, A and B. PSFT shareholders have the &#Chuzzlewit-1/31/1999
4499 Hey guys, not to rain on your parade, but if you think you'll get anything RetiredNow-1/31/1999
4498 Chuzzlewit, Please explain how PSFT can offload developmental expenses to a 100alburk-1/31/1999
4497 THIS THREAD IS CLOSED - 1998 FISCAL YEAR IS OVER -- SEE NEW THREAD: techstocksRaptor-1/31/1999
4496 besides the two additions and amemdments to the laws covering shareholder lawsubob zagorin-1/31/1999
4495 not really ! check my post 4192 d.david-1/30/1999
4494 That's what I had in mind when I was reading this letter. I watched a repoSDNA-1/30/1999
4493 Well I'm pretty sure they're trying to drum up business and they are nMelissa McAuliffe-1/30/1999
4492 it's usual that a company whose stock price gets hammered gets lawdavid-1/30/1999
4491 No, it was part of the ranting in the letter. Here is the excerpt: "You aChuzzlewit-1/30/1999
4490 Chuzz, I didn't see anything about anyone suing over options. Did I miss Melissa McAuliffe-1/30/1999
4489 Melissa, let me add one more point: Levitt and the SEC are attempting to get thChuzzlewit-1/30/1999
4488 I think that if you compare only the application software and exclude ORCL'Melissa McAuliffe-1/30/1999
4487 << So its just lots of negative hype by shorties?>> Well you have Melissa McAuliffe-1/30/1999
4486 Appreciate your response. So its just lots of negative hype by shorties? Mostbullw-1/30/1999
4485 All these class action lawsuits revolve around one thing...the accounting for aMelissa McAuliffe-1/30/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News