"beyond a reasonable doubt."
Did you know that a jury doesn't need one shred (drop, piece) of physical evidence to convict? All it takes is a single eye-witness to say, "yes, he, that guy right there, he did it." Monica's testimony is all-important, and as an eyewitness and participate (also recipient, if news stories are correct) is powerful enough so that her testimony alone could very well be enough to convince the Grand Jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Starr is just the cop here, the investigator. He's not the Grand Jury.
That's it. It's all in the jury's hands. In this case, the case would, in the case of "conviction", go to Congress.
IMO, if Starr submits his report to Congress in its current form, Clinton will survive.
How can you possibly reach that conclusion, having no idea what the report contains? Unless you are on Starr's staff, and are a co-author? Don't keep us in suspense, man. |
