SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ask Dr. Science - Is the price going up or down?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFileNext 10PreviousNext  
To: INFO_DART who wrote ()10/15/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: INFO_DART  Read Replies (1) of 4
 
I received this response via PM.

According to your "Investment Style" and "Experience" you're
trying to create something scalar isomorphic to the machine
Merton and Scholes cranked. This is impossible because of
visitations from chaos, a non-systematic translation out of the
field of local possibilities into negative expected return states.
The market maker's inventory position is perfectly quixotic and
even if you new the instantaneous state of it, you would still need
to be able to predict exogenous forces. If you could do that, you
wouldn't need the machine.

The nature of the markets is uncertain. The only positive expected
return for non members is found in the strategy of buy and hold.
It's boring and stupid. Thus, the market for the public is only a
place to buy. Success comes by never selling. That means you
shouldn't use it to perform a casino function, because your odds
are better at Vegas.

You can use the market to create machines that aren't vulnerable
to the LTCM fiasco. The problem with them is that they have a
return less than that of the perfect interest rate over the long term.
So you do a lot of work for a return less than that of T-bonds.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFileNext 10PreviousNext