| |
Gee, bede
I cannot believe you posted that! I tried to end our little war yesterday and posted a very nice and sincere apology to you for anything I had previously said about you. I tried to be diplomatic about it, stop the flaming each other, notwithstanding the fact that I think I was right and you were wrong originally. I was willing to let it go and put it behind us.
Did you read my apology here? Message 6199404
Probably not. Did you notice my remarks "I am not interested, nor have I ever been interested in, fighting with him. I regret that we had a few tense exchanges, but as far as I am concerned, enough has been said and I won't pursue it further.....I am finished with this silly squabbling and I hope bede is also. In an effort to insure more tranquility here I shall use this opportunity to apologize publicly to
bede for my remarks to him, hoping he will be gracious and accept my sincere apology and allow us to resume more important and friendly discussions."
I suggest you take a look and see if you really feel you need to continue beating me up. Hasn't this gone on long enough, or do you just like it? And, bede, I've never mentioned CyBerTrader here unless someone, like yourself, mentioned it first, in which case I may have responded to that. Also, contrary to your remarks in post 1653, you never said "that on balance CT isn't for me." You never said those words. You said a lot of others, though. For some reason, you mis-quote both me and you. You just can't seem to get a handle on telling the truth.
What a shame for you to continue taking up space here with your trivial little problems. I feel very sorry for you. Trust me, though, the last thing I want is for you to have CyBerTrader. So, why don't you just chill and let more meaningful discussions go on here? |
|
