SBC, SPRINT, MCI WORLDCOM Seek Conditions on AT&T-TCI Merger October 30, 1998 1:03 PM
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Sprint Corp. and MCI WorldCom Inc. were among the parties that formally asked the Federal Communications Commission Thursday to attach conditions to AT&T Corp. and Tele-Communications Inc.'s planned $31.8 billion merger.
SBC Communications Inc., looking to complete its own megamerger with Ameritech Corp., Friday endorsed the AT&T-TCI deal, so long as the FCC requires TCI to resell and unbundle its cable services and makes sure competitors have easy access to TCI's cable services.
The FCC is reviewing the AT&T-TCI union, the SBC-Ameritech deal as well as a third proposed merger between Bell Atlantic Corp. and GTE Corp. Executives of the telecommunications companies involved in merger plans argue that competition in the global marketplace requires large, well-capitalized companies. These global companies will reap local benefits because they willl have the capital to develop new products and even new local competitive networks.
Thursday, Sprint (FON) said AT&T (T) should be required to provide competitors fair access to TCI's (TCOMA, TCOMB) cable facilities when they are used for local telephone service. AT&T could hurt long-distance competitors like Sprint by overpricing access, Sprint said. AT&T also should be prohibited from tying TCI's cable service with AT&T's long-distance and other competitive services, it said.
AT&T has said its planned acquisition of TCI is on track for completion in the first half of next year. AT&T agreed to the deal in June, promising to upgrade TCI's cable lines into the equivalent of a local-phone network. The long-distance giant eventually hopes to use TCI's lines to transmit everything from interactive TV to local phone service and Internet access, bypassing the local Bells and saving billions in "access fees" that it now pays them to originate and terminate long-distance calls.
Thursday marked the FCC's first deadline for all parties to comment on the proposed merger, which is subject to approval by the FCC and the Justice Department. The FCC is reviewing the merger to determine whether it serves the public interest, a broad standard that includes whether it would be good for consumers and for competition.
If the merged company can prevent other companies from using TCI's high-speed lines to reach customers, competition for Internet and phone services could be crimped, many consumer groups and MCI WorldCom (WCOM) contested. AT&T and TCI executives have said they are open to providing other companies with access to the merged companies' high-speed lines, but they don't want to be forced to do so by the government.
MCI WorldCom also wants assurances that when the merged company provides local phone service over
TCI's cable lines, it will abide by the same regulations as traditional phone companies. Consumer groups also want assurances that the merged company won't raise cable rates to finance its local phone business.
Sprint, meanwhile, asked the FCC to ensure that its own ability to raise capital isn't hurt by the merger. TCI will hold about 23% of Sprint's wireless service, Sprint PCS, after a restructuring of the unit. A sale by AT&T/TCI of TCI's shares shortly after the restructuring could make it difficult for Sprint to issue new stock, the company said. Sprint asked that TCI's interest in Sprint PCS be placed under the control of an independent trustee who would oversee an orderly sale of the stock.
Sprint earlier this week postponed its planned public offering of its Sprint PCS wireless venture in the face of a generally unfriendly market. One concern was that market volatility would frighten off investors and lower demand for the stock.
The nation's third-largest long-distance company said it will continue to evaluate market conditions and may proceed with a public offering of Sprint PCS at a later date. Sprint had hoped to raise $604 million through an offering of tracking shares in the unit, but the parent company would retain total management and board control.
Copyright (c) 1998 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
|