SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Ben Ezra Weinstein (BNEZ)
BNEZ 0.00Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elio Madama who wrote (4332)11/4/1998 2:34:00 PM
From: Leroyt  Read Replies (2) of 9391
 
Elio,

From reviewing the court document, I see the following:

1. The judge doesn't know enough to issue a summary judgement. It is still possible but he can't tell if AOL simply republishes the information or makes changes, etc. 90 days for discovery.

2. After the limited discovery allowed by the judge, he will make an other decision. May be an additional 60 days to rule.

3. If BNEZ can show that AOL alters the data via the program or whatever of another company, then either:

a. The two parties settle (out of court) which is MOST likely.
b. The case goes to trial.

Depending on the significance of the verdict, AOL may or may not be willing to settle.

4. The judge may still issue a summary judgement which means that the judge does not think that BNEZ has a case and it's not worth wasting the court's time.

That my interpretation. I have been an expert witness in some very large cases in the past. I am an Engineer and not an attorney but I understand the basics of how these cases progress.

VERY FEW cases ever go to trial.

later, leroyt
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext