Ben Ezra Weinstein (BNEZ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Ben Ezra Weinstein (BNEZ)

BNEZ 0.00

Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Leroyt who wrote (4352)	11/4/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) of 9391

4. The judge may still issue a summary judgement which means that the judge does not think that BNEZ has a case and it's not worth wasting the court's time. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it AOL that asked for a summary judgement? In other words, they asked for it thinking the judge would easily or quickly award it as AOL felt the CDA would "protect" them. ? The fact that the judge said "no" right now to AOL's request and awarded the limited discovery to BNEZ says he thinks there is more it (being a content provider) than that with AOL in this case. Sounds to me like BNEZ's lawyers showed enough about how AOL "shows" or relays quotes to warrant the discovery. So I do not get the impression at all that the judge "does not think that BNEZ has a case". Seems he thinks there may be more it and is allowing the discovery to determine that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next