BUZZZZ!
Wrong again paulie. And in so many ways in one post!
It was a pooling and they didn't capture august revenues, they "captured" the entire quarter! However the share count of 104.457 million shares was used to reflect the operating profit, not the 85 to 87 million you were expecting. In addition, the comparisons reflect a two year retroactive restatement to include the pooling! Nice try.
Losses are calculated using non-diluted share counts. Standard practice, and irrelevant since the focus is on operating profits not one time charges related to transaction fees, real estate consolidation and severance packages. Funny thing though, if they used the HIGHER share count to calculate the losses, the losses would have been LOWER!
Your brilliant thinking is making me rotlmao!
I guess it took you a few days to begin posting again since it takes more time to get more creative with your fabrications.
What's your thinking on October market share? Expecting declines?
Regarding A/R's factored or no, they declined significantly as a percentage of revenues. That's why the calculation declined sequentially. Channel stuffing? Quite the opposite based on september/october sell through.
The issue for all of this is what are the trends and the answer is the trends are favorable and improving.
Let's use facts paulie, what has changed for the worse?
Why aren't you short now? Expecting the stock to move higher since the entire world of investors, analysts, stores, franchises, and customers are all just shills for the company?
TD |
