Pacel (PLRP): If NASA likes them, shouldn't we? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Pacel (PLRP): If NASA likes them, shouldn't we?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Retaylor who wrote (1637)	11/11/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: Robert B.	Read Replies (1) of 3171

<...Calkins is making all the wrong moves, if you are referring to individuals who were paid to promote, who cares! But when you are talking in terms of setting this company up for big revenues in the future and getting your product seen by the right people, David Calkins is doing a brilliant job.> If the product is so great and the future looks so bright, why would Calkins need to waste his time paying someone to promote PLRP on SI? Especially a 19 year old??? Not only do I consider this very deceitful, but also a HUGE red flag. Think of penny stocks that were promoted by paid SI posters in the past...I can't think of any that were successful but I can name a few that are in the gutter. Credibility of a company does contributes to the share price. Who cares? Well, obviously all of the people that sold and contributed to the share price drop after they found out about Patrick.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next