SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Trader who wrote (12259)1/9/1999 5:45:00 PM
From: August  Read Replies (2) of 44573
 
Tom, this is the Monte Carlo analysis. Have you played blackjack?

What you stated is the concept behind winning in black jack. Increase your wager on higher probability hands (derived from counting cards). And wager only the base minimum wager on lower probability hands. In the case of black jack, one have to wager something on every hand as long as he want to sit at the table. In the case of the market, the minimum wager is zero. One does not have to wager at all on low probability situation. That's how I was able to beat the house on black jack (when I was a student). I played black jack in the casino only several times, but I was prepared before I went.

In the case of black jack, the odds of winning is a little less than 50% on the average. If you win, you win 100% of the wager amount, likewise when you lose. In this situation, the base wager should be no more than 2% of your capital. Of course, you increase the wager above the base wager when the odds are better.

Use the same approach to the market. Investing different amounts based on the risk/reward ratio as well as the absolute level of risk.

As for your system, is a signal A signal, or there are signal and there ARE SIGNALS? If all your signals are indistinguishable, then there is little in the way of varying the number of contracts to achieve optimal results. If you can differentiate your different signals, and quantify the risk/reward levels, then you can simply back test different base wager and different ratio for increasing wagers over several years and look at the return vs. maximum drawdown to come up a amounts and ratios that you are comfortable with. There aren't that much to test. Err on the conservative side for preservation of capital, for then you will prevail in the end even under the most adverse conditions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext