SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kash johal who wrote (50171)2/19/1999 8:27:00 PM
From: Xpiderman  Read Replies (3) of 1580148
 
Re: Message 7925949

kash,

You are right on! AMD's lack of communication with the Wall Street and its investors drove investors away. If they could learn only half what you mentioned, AMD stock price could be 50% higher.

Investors don't like bad news, but very much fear lack of information.

On the other hand, maybe, just maybe, AMD tried its best to inform it fellow investors. But what about even AMD itself don't know what to expect when they put a very aggressive chip design on manufacture in a hurry, and only found the chip it produced was not fast enough.

It's fair to say that Intel controls how much $$$ AMD could make. It's like Sanders drove a broken car without steering wheel, without gas paddle, without break… no passengers in this world want to be in this car. But what about AMD investors are they ridding this car with Sanders?

AMD might be a good trading stock, because investors tend to have very polarized opinion on it: they love it for a while and hate it to death, this creates a wild swing of investing sentiment and very volatile stock price. So, some very smart people like Greg, may take advantage of it and making a nice profit.

I just want everyone making $$$, long or short...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext