SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cliff emohs who wrote (7280)3/7/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: cliff weller  Read Replies (1) of 9096
 
Cliff, nice links,

I don't think we've seen some of that info before.

Just to clarify the aircraft name. The Soviets called it a Tu-160. NATO for their own obscure reasons gave it the "code name" Blackjack, which when run through the secret NATO decoder ring means russianheavy supersonicbomberthatlookslikeab1anddoesthesamekindofstuffonlyprobablynotasgood.

Now, as you recall, part of the hold-up in the paperwork transfer was the need to get these things demilitarized--removing the armaments, weapons aiming systems, bombsights, active and passive electronic warfare systems, etc, etc. Now that this has been done, perhaps the NATO code name should not be used. I like "Blackhawk". I hope NATO gets the word.

Worst case scenario:

Supreme Allied Headquarters:

31 DEC 1999 23:59:47

"Sir, we have reports of a flight of three Blackjacks entering Polish airspace, heading west. They claim to be Howard Foote Blackhawks on a commercial mission--intelligence thinks this is a clever ruse, sir."

31 DEC 1999 23:59:58

"Get me the President"

01 JAN 2000 00:00:04

"Sir, they're jamming our radar. Digital readout now indicates 1900 bombers in the air!!

Etc

Maybe we should paint smiley faces on the tails, just in case. . .

Happy trades

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext