SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James who wrote (7394)3/17/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: ewaggin  Read Replies (2) of 9096
 
James D.: check any of the many links for "TU-144LL"

This aircraft is being used to obtain data for the HSCT program. It has been re-fitted with the same engines used by the TU-160.

These engines are more powerful than the originals, and are capable of pushing the TU-144LL to nearly Mach 3.0, although the longevity of the engine is measured (literally) in minutes at this speed (which is not planned on in the test series).

As another poster noted, the Russians have, in the past, followed a design philosophy which emphasized ruggedness, simplicity, and speed, at the expense of fuel economy and, with respect to the engines, longevity.

While these qualities may detract from the value of a combat aircraft, they are not a drawback for a cargo hauler, especially one which will make relatively short and infrequent flights. Used only for actual launches (and perhaps some self-ferrying), these aircraft should actually be rather economical to operate. Also, I suspect that the launch flight profile will make only limited use of the full power setting, which will do much to extend the time between engine replacements.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext