Hi, Barbara..
You might be able to help me understand something here, regarding the trading logs and all...
I'm confused as to why the Market Makers would be choosing to screw with PABN over many other securities. I mean, they would have to move millions of shares at these (possibly) artificially depressed prices to even buy lunch for the office, for cryin' out loud. The sole motivating factor in this arena is to make money. How, then, do the MMs propose to make money off of PABN? By shorting it further (if in fact they've shorted it at all..)? How profitable is it, really, to short at .016, in hopes of covering at, say, .014?
It's probably inexcusable for me to say so, since I still hold a good chunk of shares, but the "positive" talk on the thread seems to have taken on delusional characteristics...especially in light of the stock performance and John's reluctance to provide numbers...
Could it possibly be that things are not, if you pardon the expression, as rosey as presented?
Not to be construed as flame, bash, slam, etc...just a few honest observations looking for rational discussion..
Russ |
