Are you telling me that I misquoted you here? Your FRAUD lies in the fact that you quoted me out of context and have tried to put words in my mouth that I never said. So, why don't you tell me which parts here I have given you credit for that you never said? Well, Ms. FRAUD?
Oh wait a min ... I think I just figured it out ... Isn't it true that you need the link not because you do not remember for a mere couple of hours what you said, but really because someone else using your account really said it and you did not bother to read what they said before your shift began? Naughty Naughty Ms. FRAUD. SI rules are one person per account. Surely you knew that when you started sharing your account ... no?
To: ColleenB (30290 )
From: LegalBeast
Monday, Mar 29 1999 1:48PM ET
Reply # of 30347
Wow, just like your mentor, A FRAUD SPEAKS OF FRAUD ... Lets examine the
record ... I suppose that you will deny this, but since it is all within the last day, I trust
you won't need links to find it, Ms. FRAUD?
Your comment which gets you what you deserve:
I believe you have taken liberty to one statement I've made, to which I've made
specific reference to and didn't make it a wide ranging all encompassing
statement.
So when I said:
Rather, it is just another piece of credibility for the company. It goes like this:
Panam has, as its director of R&D a person who is so qualified and so involved
in cutting edge technology that he is selected for this honor, and it is indeed an
honor. From this you are perhaps thinking that if such a professional is on the
PABN team, then PABN must be a bit more than a scam and actual R&D must
be going on. What R&D? Heck, I dunno, but neither do you. All we do know is
that we are amassing a stable full of professionals who can get the job done,
don't you think?
You chose to only take one little piece and infer that I said something I never said at all.
What you copied and said was:
"The fact that Larry is presenting does not speak to the "Big Time". Rather, it is
just another piece of credibility for the company."
Does it really? Isn't he and the other "boys" hired consultants? I seem to have
read a post on the bull that somebody had quite a lengthy phone conversation
with someone and his post explained that these gentlemen were consultants to
PanAm. And given Mr. Roof's background (published programming books)
coupled with the fact that this is really an educational seminar (read the Microsoft
links), I am wondering just how much exposure PanAm will really get out of this.
Doesn't it really seem more likely that he's going to tout the billing program that
he created (I believe he may be the creator)? These computer professionals will
not be interested in the health services division of PanAm. What is more probable
is that they will be interested in the programming of said item. So, the question is
what is there really to get excited about for PanAm stock holders? The fact that
PanAm has hired consultants to program for them?
Now Ms. FRAUD, I never said anything about exposure for Panam, now did I?
Neither did John, did he? In fact, my point was nothing like you tried to
MISREPRESENT, now was it, Ms. FRAUD? We are talking about qualifications here,
nothing more.
You wonder why folks will not discuss the issues with you? Here is an example of
where you take a reasonable comment and try to turn it into something it never said.
Now tell us, Ms. FRAUD, how many names do you post under over on RB? |
