PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN)

PABN 0.00001000

0.0%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ColleenB who wrote (30667)	4/1/1999 6:42:00 PM
From: barbara sperino	Read Replies (1) of 43774

Colleen During the inter-active meeting there was camera set up in each division of pabn. At that time their was a camera at RMC. At that time RMS was a part of pabn. If it wasn't than why would Mr. Williams have allowed this???? <We have continuing obligations on both parts that extend out.> Could it be that the continuing obligation as mentioned about were not met on either pabn part or on RMC part? If these obligation where not met would it not also null and void any contract that the two companies had. Now if John Schmitz knowingly lied about there being a contract at the time of the meeting Than I would say the SEC will be showing up soon. If there was a reason for voiding the contract, well it happens all the time.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next