Today's "More Stupid Than jhild" award goes to...
drum roll please! And the winner is.....jhild!
"So according to your spin they were 100% acquired just like RMC that unravelled after 9 months. Hahahaha." "...just like..."? Nope. That is YOUR spin. Actually, I don't know the details of the deal. Do not EVER put words into my mouth again. I find that habit of yours to be highly offensive.
You however, seem to be claiming that you DO know those details. Care to share with us how you came by the following information which you present as fact?: "The deal that never completes, then eh? If they are still in escrow then that means that there are still some unmet conditions and yet again maybe another announcement just like the "PanAmerican BanCorp has recently decided to forgo pursuing opportunities with Realty Money Center, Inc." Hahahaha."
"That means..." Sorry, but you are assuming too much, even for you. If the terms of a deal call for certain things to be held, then the fact that they are being held COMPLETES the agreement. Yet you want your readers to believe that completing one of the terms of an agreement (in this case it would be holding the shares in an escrowed account) is evidence that the agreement is NOT complete. How much of a twistedness must be in a mind for it to believe that doing something is evidence of not doing that thing? A person who thinks like that would probably think that violations by one company (Greenway) mean something bad about a completely separate company (PABN)... Let me ask you: If one of your neighbors robs a bank does that make you a thief? It must given the connection you are twisting between Greenway and PABN... Thus the award you have earned for yourself -- being More Stupid Than jhild. Congrats!
Yet, lest I forget, you did not win the award JUST for that! Here are some more of your "FACTS," presented without supporting evidence, and without qualifiers. Tsk, Tsk, you are slipping!: "So you have been deployed to SI, perhaps because the research is leading uncomfortably close to the source of the money that PABN is using to run it's operations? Are there more Greenway Capital/Cortlandt people lurking in the wings here? The story is getting better and better."
Care to back up that "deployed" comment? It is not true, yet you present it as an accomplished fact. For your information, once and for all and on the record: I am not now, nor have I ever been in the employ of anyone regarding PABN nor have I been deployed here or anywhere by anyone to do anything. You have earned your titles "The Accuser" and "The Deceiver" with that comment.
But there is MORE! Come one, come all and witness the foolishness of someone who is More Stupid Than jhild: "Need I remind anyone that financial filing with the SEC would have long ago helped to straighten these details out, but for some reason they have refused? Maybe we are now hitting on the reason they have been evading the filing of these financials. Time for DD. Time for DUE DISCLOSURE.
I see, so you think PABN has "refused" to file financials. In order to refuse, there must be some demand or order or rule that they must obey, but "refuse" to do so. Just which demand, order or rule has PABN "refused" to follow? The answer is: There is no such demand, order or rule which they must obey. PABN is in full compliance with all SEC rules. You have clearly stated as an affirmative statement that the company has "refused" to file their financials with the SEC. But that is not the case, which you know. But, being More Stupid Than yourself, you don't think anyone else will notice that fact, like the ostrich with its head burried, if you can't see something you think no one else can either. Tsk, Tsk.
Also, even though you KNOW DD stands for Due Diligence, you insist on spreading the lie over and over again that it means Due Disclosure. "Due Disclosure" seems to be something you insist on from others but are frightened of concerning yourself. I guess you are exempt from the Golden Rule. Apparently you think DD means Due Disclosure, about everyone else but not about you. The fact is, you choose not to disclose any personal information about yourself. I did not say you "refused" to do so, although you probably would say so about yourself if you applied the same standards to yourself which you apply to others.
Observer observed a Proverb that was appropriate to you. I've got one too. Proverbs says that the adulteress goes about her business and really believes she has not betrayed her vows, that she has done nothing wrong (Pr 30:20). You seem to see nothing wrong with making up stories about the company that have no basis in fact, with misleading the investing public by impinging people's character by associating them with events they had nothing to do with, by associating defunct businesses with operating entities that have no association with each other AND by making up senarios based on fraud, misconduct, failures to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities, just to name a few.
Here's another Proverb I think was written just for you: "A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions." Pr 18:2 To my way of thinking that short sentence explains the real reason why you refuse to call the company, and why you insist on making up stories, and why you continue to mislead the investing public with your lies and misrepresentations. Like you, a fool is more stupid than himself. Why? Because he believes his own nonsense and has no desire to understand what is really happening.
Congratulations on your award, you have truly earned it!
PCM
GO PABN!!!
(I edited a typo) |
