SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bernard Levy who wrote (3748)5/17/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: MikeM54321  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
Re: ILEC's DSL Upgrade Requirements

"Some providers may be offering DSL service right now without having upgraded their COs and local loop accordingly, but when the ILECs start rolling out DSL service systematically, this is one thing they will handle carefully."

Bernard, Frank, or Thread,
Could you fill us in on the generalities of what the ILECs would be facing if there was full deployment of DSL services. I think I have a general idea of what they have to do inside the CO, but on the other side, I'm not real certain? By "other side," of the CO, I mean the side AWAY from the home and offices.

IMHO, inside the CO is very complex because of all the flavors and lack of standards DSL has. Between the CO and the home, I constantly read where the twisted copper pair has to be, "groomed." At the premises, again it's to complicated to figure out what will happen.

But the "other side," holds a great deal interest to me. I think it may be a fairly standard procedure to blast bandwidth down to the CO. So that is that part I'm very curious about. If I'm not mistaken there are some 33,000 COs around the country and I'm currently under the assumption getting them fed, with the necessary bandwidth, is a big proposition.
Thanks,
MikeM(From Florida)

PS Just for my reference, here is where I recently brought it up:
Message 9195275
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext