"SI buy PABN in the first place? Triple hahahahahaha.
And how would you know what they do or do not invest in? There you go again with your innuendo."
Actually, it may not be innuendo at all. Given the fact that jhild did not qualify his comment, with "in my opinion" or "it seems unlikely that..." etc., he may, as investor1 as wondered, know something about the subject in question.
If you take into account the performance of this stock recently, it becomes even more interesting. His maniacal laugh reminds me of how I felt when PABN made records in trading volume last month and how I still feel occasionally when I think about the base that has been established about 900% above the lows of last month. His answer, a question with a question, followed by that laugh could indicate an evasive answer calculated to mislead -- as in "Are you worried?" and the answer, "What?! Me Worry?!? Hahahahah" When the answerer is in fact very worried indeed.
But then, if he in fact does NOT know, then, in the absence of qualifiers, his denial of them buying PABN is a lie, even if they are invested in it (the denial is the lie, not the investment).
Tangled Webs. I seem to recall having predicted something along this line.
The pieces of the puzzle are out there, I'm SURE of it. The dots are there on the paper, they must connect somehow. It's finding all the dots and connecting them that is the challenge. We need a good source for information!
However, if one applies jhild's DD philosophy, then one must NOT ask jhild anything about himself, since he must be the least reliable source for any information about himself.
I guess the only way to test my theory is to ask him about himself. What a paradox! Tangled webs, indeed! Fortunately for me, many have already asked him. I guess the proof of my theory would have to be in his responses to them.
PCM
GO PABN!!!
|
