Hi don
I see you finally put all those capital letters you've been saving up to good use. Good for you.
Here's the real deal don. marcos and jhild think we are all a bunch of fools to be invested in a startup company like this. marcos says we are "suckers."
They consider themselves to be much smarter than we are because they have a different investment strategy. But they are not really sure. So, to prove their superiority they come here to belittle, harass and berate. The fact is that from an IQ and possibly education standpoint they probably do have a leg up on a lot of people. But being morally bankrupt, and insecure they have to put others down to find proof of their superiority. The proof they should be seeking, based on the performance of their strategy, is not there. Now, I've not seen their portfolios, but the circumstantial evidence is fairly strong that they aren't doing well. Anyone can find a stock that's performed well lately and say, 'see I own this one.' Every day I can find reporting companies whose stock went down. Crash goes that theory.
You see, as we all know, any investment is a crap shoot, reporting company or no. No matter what, no investment carries a guarantee. They cannot admit to themselves their superior investment strategy is different, but not fool proof. (If you think about it, since they believe in it, it can't be fool proof...)
As marcos' songs tell his story, he lost his shirt gambling in the pennies. Must have got in over his head, because did not do the research he should have done, so he let some hypster play him for a sucker and got taken to the cleaners. No wonder he has to prove to himself over and over again we are "suckers" and no wonder that he can't so he comes back again and again for another try. His own insecurity short circuits his own intelligence. In that kind of a situation, all that is left is to be the playground bully and affect a mocking attitude that we are here merely so he can laugh at us.
His only rational comment is a tautology: The company is a non-reporting company. Which he declares is inexcusable. As though, from his god-like position of superiority, he was qualified to make such a pronouncement. Even if it was just his opinion, it would still be indefensible. Regardless, the SEC has a different opinion, and there's is the only one that counts. He can choose to think differently, but that's one windmill that really is a dragon.
PCM
GO PABN!!!
|
