Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Curtis who wrote (11911)	6/7/1999 2:15:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

John, I've gotta agree with you about a buy-out. The value of the company is not measured by the capacity and pricing for the product coming on-line now, but the capacity coming on-line later this fall and the jump in energy capacity of the product coming online sometime later this year and then next. Factoring in lines 1-4 and a product at least 40% better than anything out there, for which they can attain a price premium, the stock could well be priced closer to $100/sh with P/E of only 30 or so. This could happen in less than 12 months. IF they want to buy us out for $100/sh now, maybe I'd think about it. But even then, the stock could still grow exponentially from there if the company's plans for licensing the technology and materials patents comes to fruition. Rich

To: John Curtis who wrote (11911)	6/7/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: William Epstein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

John Curtis; You know I just mentioned it in passing. I don't think so either. Not after the Valence board has gone to the trouble they've gone to. We certainly have a group of lunytunes watching and waiting on every word spoken or perhaps, thought. Maybe some think they are telepathic too. It's like listening to some of the old radio comedies. Sometimes, it is even, slapstick.What alter do they worship at? I would like to know. With regard, to the fingerprint ID. It may be found to be unconstitutional to require it. That is why Gov't issued, nonvoluntary identity cards are illegal. For the system to really work I would think that the vast majority say, 65% have to participate. Like I don't want a picture ID on my driver's license. Restricting usage to those who do participate is discrimination. With regard to a buyout which is very unlikely. You can see my logic. A tender offer would give me a fast profit probably, a huge one considering, how much time the money has been invested. The longer I'm invested, the more profit needed to justify the investment. Doesn't anyone recognize that not all situations on this thread are the same and that time is money? Sure, I am interested in the other participants but No 1 comes first. I would think no one would disagree with that. (famous, last words) Bill