SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cosmo Kramer who wrote (13073)6/8/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: John Nasser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Oh geez.... More good news?? ... We're in trouble.




To: Cosmo Kramer who wrote (13073)6/8/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: John Nasser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Was this an expected revenue from the patents? I don't recall any talk of UMC using our patents?

Not a bad chuck of change,eh?

Almost a $1/share in cash!




To: Cosmo Kramer who wrote (13073)6/8/1999 4:08:00 PM
From: R Lam  Respond to of 14577
 
If the $42M payment is for license fees and release of contingencies related to the Jan 6 1998 sale of USC shares then I have a question about the worth of the license fees. My understanding was that S3 could receive up to $45M more from the 1998 sale contingent upon certain "liquidity events". Did they give up the potential $45M payment if USC went public and license out certain patents for $42M present payment?

Comments?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News