SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Temp. Home of Cooperative Group-Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (19)6/8/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: Pancho Villa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 790
 
MVIS: appealing but it may be a dangerous "Ballard Power like"
puppy. I don't know enough about the technology to conclude it may
not be the best thing since sliced bread. the story is a powerful
one...
Did you see the 6/1 s3?

PROSPECTUS, Subject to Completion, dated June 1, 1999

MICROVISION, INC.

286,150 shares of Common Stock
143,075 Common Stock Purchase Warrants

Three of our current securityholders will, from time to time, be offering
and selling these shares of our common stock and common stock purchase warrants.
We reserved the shares and the warrants for issuance to one of the selling
securityholders in August 1996 when it acted as a representative of the several
underwriters of our common stock and common stock purchase warrants in
connection with our initial public offering of common stock and warrants.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (19)6/8/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: RaserX  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 790
 
Dear Bill,

Please visit mvispages.com. If Zeev Hed's analysis
of MVIS is indicative of his financial acumen, I suggest caution.
I warned him against shorting MVIS at 16 and he obviously lost
a fortune. Some guys consistently adopt a cynical pose to camouflage
their intellectual shortcomings.

After MVIS'S run up, Zeev Hed no longer posts on the MVIS board. Unless of course he is using an alias. Due your DD.......



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (19)6/9/1999 3:48:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 790
 
I've already taken a look at MVIS (a few weeks ago) and it didn't appeal to me as a short. Granted the stock is very expensive...but it could get a lot more expensive. I never short a stock based strictly on overvaluation - I have to have clear evidence of excessive promotion and/or fraud (e.g. CCSI, MCHM, etc.)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News