Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Temp. Home of Cooperative Group-Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (32)	6/8/1999 11:11:00 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 790

So Zeev did you go long on MVIS when it was 16? You must have made a bundle if you did. I played it from 18 to 22 and I've been sorry I sold it. I keep waiting for the damn stock to pullback big but it never does and they keep coming out with all this great news. I've been watching how some of the more accomplished shorts have been getting burned trying to short it. I'm not sure your logic is going to prevail in the very short term. I think the stock will have at least one more big pop. Just my opinion. Lola:)

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (32)	6/9/1999 1:25:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 790

Zeev, you may not be the only one who considers MVIS a short candidate. I noticed today when getting a real time quote for MVIS on ETrade that there was a little message with the quote that said something like "this security may be difficult to borrow." Question: why do you think it will take them 3 years (minimum) to commercialize a product when the company is talking about sales in the late 1999 and 2000 time frame? The one analyst following the stock apparently thinks they will see significant sales in 2000 since the earnings projection is (.85) for 1999 and (.13) in 2000. Why are you so skeptical about this timeframe?