Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (11390)	6/9/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: truedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

to: neocon from: truedog Re: cons Thank you for the response. I knew you were going to be busy and did not want you to go to any extra trouble just to educate me. I understand the principles of the two groups, but had not heard the labels before. I can not condone any sort of communism, or even socialism, because I fear it is anti individual endeavors and rewards those who don't work but take from the communal store house. It definitly appears that Pat Buchanan has taken a radical road, which I can not support either. I am surprised at Buckley's acceptance of the neos. I always thought of him as a rock hard republican, industrial type conservative. I too, am a republican but refrain from any radical approach. I voted for Goldwater in '64 which very many did not. He was misunderstood and viciously maligned by L.B.J.. I come from an area that knew Lyndon quite well and know what an SOB and back stabber he was. Having been in manufacturing all my working life, I am not pro union and we ran our company so that all of the 200+ employees never wanted one and voted them down each time an organization attempt was made. I mainly oppose the interference of organized crime between employee and employer. Thanks again for being nice, truedog