SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Bakunin who wrote (61877)6/9/1999 3:09:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
mike, zeev argued that rmbs pushes that limit more than ddram so that means rmbs will be adopted. what is your take on this concept?

i just don't think people will pay for the performance. heck, if they won't pay up for piiis, why pay up for rmbs? ;-)



To: Michael Bakunin who wrote (61877)6/9/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 132070
 
mb,

Lifted from the Intel thread.....

June 9, 1999

PC Magazine: Computing power has increased at an amazing--and
amazingly consistent--pace. New technologies promise more of the same
in the future

By Nick Stam

In 1965, Intel Corp. cofounder Gordon Moore predicted that the
density of transistors in an integrated circuit would double every year.
His observation, dubbed Moore's Law, was later changed to every 18
months. Moore's Law has proven remarkably accurate for over three
decades. Not only transistor density but also microprocessor
performance tends to follow Moore's Law.

Andy Grove, former Intel CEO and chairman, predicted at Fall Comdex
1996 that by the year 2011, Intel will ship a microprocessor with 1
billion transistors, operating at 10 GHz, using a 0.07-micron
semiconductor process technology able to calculate 100 billion
operations per second.

Microprocessor Report's founder and executive editor, Michael Slater,
thinks that in the future, doubling transistor count may require more
than 18 months when moving from one major chip design or fabrication
technology to the next. This is due both to chip logic's becoming more
complicated (requiring longer design and validation time frames) and to
increasingly difficult hurdles in chip fabrication technology.

Fabrication Improvements

Fabrication technology must improve in many areas with each successive
process generation, such as the move from 0.25-micron design to 0.18.
One particularly critical process is photolithography, where
short-wavelength light sources are focused with a number of precision
lenses and shone through small transparent masks containing circuit
details. This exposes the photoresist on a wafer's surface, which is
chemically removed leaving microscopic details of the circuit pattern on
the wafer.

According to Mark Bohr, who is Intel's director of process architecture
and integration technology and an Intel Fellow, light sources and optics
must evolve in concert. Later this year, Intel will ship 0.18-micron
Pentium III chips using the same 248-nm wavelength deep-UV light
source as used in current 0.25-micron Pentium II and Pentium III chips.
But when moving to 0.13-micron processes three or four years from now,
expect to see 193-nm wavelengths using excimer lasers as the light
source.

Beyond 0.13- could be a 0.09-micron process, which would use 157-nm
wavelength excimer lasers, according to Bohr. And the next step below
0.09 is a big one in terms of technology and manufacturing processes:
the 0.07-micron process in Grove's processor of 2011. This level of
photolithography will likely require extreme-UV (EUV) light sources.
EUV has a wavelength of only 13nm, which has long-term potential for
etching far smaller transistors but is confounded by the fact that there
are no known transparent mask materials that will allow such short
wavelengths to pass through. This requires entirely new reflective
lithography processes and optics to be implemented coincident with EUV.

As you continue to increase the number of transistors over time,
transistor interconnect wires get smaller and closer together, increasing
resistance and capacitance while adding to circuit delays. To reduce
resistance and shrink interconnect line widths at the smaller dimensions,
copper will displace aluminum as the interconnect metal of choice, as
seen in the new IBM PowerPC G3 chips. AMD's CTO, Atiq Raza,
predicts AMD's new chips will be in copper by the second quarter of
1999. Bohr expects that future Intel CPUs in the 0.13-micron process
and beyond will use copper interconnects.

Physical Limits

Power and heat management could pose huge problems in the future. As
transistors continue to shrink, their gate oxides become only a few
molecules thick in order to maintain required transistor switching
speeds, and low voltages will be necessary to maintain their structural
integrity. Intel has stated that chips ten years from now will operate at
less than 1 volt and could easily consume 40 to 50 watts of power, which
implies 50-amp currents or larger. Evenly distributing such huge
amounts of current within the chip and dissipating the tremendous
amount of heat generated are both subjects of much research.

Will current silicon fabrication methods hit physical limits by the year
2017 (as many have predicted), meaning that we'll reach a point where
we just won't be able to build usable transistors any smaller? It's
difficult to look that far ahead, but research into areas such as
molecular nanotechnology, optical or photonic computing, quantum
computing, DNA computing, chaotic computing, and other seemingly
esoteric areas of research may prove to be fruitful, changing totally the
way we design and manufacture microprocessors or perform
computations.

Not only will fabrication technologies undergo huge changes in the
coming years, but so will microprocessor architectures, including in their
logic designs, instruction sets, registr sets, external interfaces, and
on-board memory sizes. According to John Hennessy, dean of Stanford
University's School of Engineering and cofounder of MIPS Computer
Systems, we are in the later stages of the quest for more
instruction-level parallelism (ILP), particularly with the x 86
instruction set, though we still do expect to see more complex 32-bit x
86 processors from AMD, Cyrix, Intel, and others in the coming years.

There are plenty of creative microarchitectural techniques available to
enhance 32-bit x 86 designs for many years to come, according to Fred
Pollack, director of Intel's Microcomputer Research Lab and an Intel
Fellow. But Pollack also stated that reaching substantially higher levels
of performance require totally new methods.

To move to the next generation, Intel and HP introduced their EPIC
(Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing) instruction set technology,
which is a radical departure from x 86, in October 1997. Their 64-bit
IA-64 architecture is the first instruction set to incorporate EPIC
principles, and their upcoming Merced processor is the first IA-64
implementation. Pollack says Intel will initially target IA-64 at
workstation and server segments and future high-end 32-bit x86 chips
at professionals and power users. Raza and Pollack think 64-bit
processing will be mainstream in ten years, but they are hesitant to
forecast 64-bit processors on all our desktops in five years.

An incredibly important objective, according to AMD's Raza is to get
as much fast memory as close to the processor as possible and to reduce
latencies to I/O devices. Raza claims we must design future CPU chips
with far faster and more direct interactions with main memory,
graphics, and especially lower bandwidth streaming devices. We'll also
see a trend toward PC-on-a-chip designs.

Chip Multiprocessors (CMPs) include multiple processor cores on a
single chip and are expected to proliferate during the next decade.
We'll need to see more multithreaded applications and multitasking to
take advantage of these architectures. In the long term, such
multiprocessing designs may delay the need to shift to exotic computer
designs, if we assume silicon technology really will hit the wall around
2017. But it will take time for CMPs and complex multithreaded
applications to evolve in the mainstream markets, according to Hennessy.
He believes the embedded-CPU market would be the first target for
CMPs. Slater believes we'll see CMPs in workstations and servers,
though memory bandwidth for the multiple cores on a chip could be a
problem.

Expect much innovation for many years ahead in silicon fabrication and
CPU architectures. You'll have a billion transistors on a chip by the
year 2011--if not sooner--and your computing devices will be far more
powerful than you can imagine