Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC: BETTING, INC. A WAGER ON NEW GAMING TECHNOLOGY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SCOOBEY-DO who wrote (2513)	6/9/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: steveK.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2909

Last trade of the day-25,000 share buy at the ask of .54 cents.Gotta like that.Looks like we ended with almost 2/1 buys to sells.Volume was over 190,000 traded.The pattern of growing volume is still intact(for almost ten days now)at this time.Don't be surprised to see a little break out on the upside soon.Maybe to the .60's.It looks like the indicators are there to me.JMHO of course.I'm long and comfortable here.Go BETT! Happy Returns- stevek.

To: SCOOBEY-DO who wrote (2513)	6/10/1999 2:37:00 AM
From: DaiTN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2909

Scoobey - Enlighten me on the subject of 10,000,000 shares at @.62. I understand about the assign value to a stock for the SEC to approve, but does it mean that eConnect can only sell the shares at any price above .62 cents but not below? Regarding the additional XXX shares Tom will get, I don't have a problem with that. If the management can bring this stock to $3.00 for 20 consecutive days so Tom can buy (I forgot it was 13 or 23 millions) more share at .30 cents, then Tom deserves it. It's a win win situation for both management and shareholders (most large companies set up the incentives that way (may be not that many shares), but I still don't have the problem with that. The problem I have is (as I stated on my report about "conflict of interest"),when Tom uses his voting power to control the Board of Directors of econnect, to sign more agreements for more payments to ET&T. Being a majority shareholder of eConnect, he can do what ever he wants with those deals. Remember that "net earnings" is after "cost of goods sold" and "expenses" (payment to ET&T is a cost of goods sold). It means that eConnect can be operated at a loss, but Tom and his ET&T would have postive earnings while the shareholders end up with a net loss and a negative equities. Here is an example for illustration: Sales.........100,000 COGS.........< 70,000> (40,000 cost of sales + 30,000 payment to ET&T) Gross Income...30,000 Less Expenses.<40,000> Net loss......<10,000> The end results is that ET&T make $30,000 while the shareholders of eConnect loose $10,000. I hope you all see my point. Again, I welcome any opinion from everyone including Tom. Dai