SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrick Hennessey who wrote (46241)6/10/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
pat, i think you are wrong. eps do matter. talk to me in three weeks. your note shows much emotion.



To: Patrick Hennessey who wrote (46241)6/11/1999 7:47:00 AM
From: Keith A Walker  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 53903
 
I agree. Earnings DO NOT, repeat, DO NOT really matter here. In fact, the positive correlation to MU's stock price is: negative earnings and the stock goes higher, positive earnings and the stock goes lower.

Take a lesson from John Malone, founder and chairman of TCI, his thesis was that earnings were a BAD thing since he would then have to pay Federal taxes. Instead, he borrowed to the MAX and paid out interest (read earnings) to his bondholders, which he was himself. In other words, since interest expense is tax DEDUCTIBLE, and profits are TAXED, he was better off with a huge amount of debt, hence the stock rose.

Perception is all that matters and the perception is that there will not be enough DRAM, etc. to meet demand in the coming months, years. Shorts should probably cover right about now and enjoy the upward momentum for a while. When MU begins showing earnings, go short again. Just my opinion FWIW. By the way, if my memory serves me correctly, MU was not reporting positive earnings when the stock hit 90+. I will check on that point.

Happy trading, Keith



To: Patrick Hennessey who wrote (46241)6/11/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: Fabeyes  Respond to of 53903
 
Those words sounded in 985 to. And it did happen, but I am not sure the hearts are strong enough to se MU below $5.00 or even $2.00 a share.



To: Patrick Hennessey who wrote (46241)6/13/1999 11:14:00 PM
From: John Graybill  Respond to of 53903
 
Earnings themselves might not matter, but the whole earnings-announcement "event", time-wise, is more often than not a turning point. (Note that MU's earnings announcements happen just before the end of the calendar quarter, which is a big decision point for mutual funds, tax matters, etc.) But its correlation with the previous quarter's earnings (backward-looking) is zero.