To: tejek who wrote (61574 ) 6/12/1999 3:50:00 PM From: Amy J Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573717
Tejek, RE: "however i will get its title and post it to the thread. In fact because of your interest i will go back and review my dd notes and see if i can post some of the other titles for you." Thanks Tejek, I'd really appreciate that. RE: "intc's control and dominance would be diminished in general." This would be interesting to discuss - there are some issues at the moment on the low-end IMHO. RE: "similar to the kind we see was made by prudential securities in their recent earnings report or for that matter, by intc investors who suggest that amd is sitting on a stockpile of k-6 chips that they can not sell and other purported amd rumors. I thought i was careful to distinguish between fact and fiction.....do you disagree?" Yes I agree, I think you made it clear you were reporting on comments from an article. I was just curious about the report. RE: "intc can not afford to "weather the storm" Yes, I concur a company should never "weather the storm" RE: "or intc investors like i presume you are" I am primarily an Intel investor. Yesterday, I did pick up AMD leaps as a short-term hedge. RE: "Aren't you concern that intc may be losing its once enviable position in the market place?" On the low-end, yes. But not overall in the industry. RE: "Amy j, i will try to get back to you by monday on at least thestreet.com article" Tejek, I'd appreciate that. RE: "i have noted that your postings are well thought out, articulate and very detailed oriented" Thank you, I appreciate hearing this. RE: "was a clear attempt to denigrate much like he does with others on the amd and other non intc threads. I thought you were above all that. I am sorry to learn otherwise." Tejek, I made an honest to goodness mistake. I didn't even know I mistyped your name until someone told me I did today. I had no idea of the error. I apologized in my post # 61570. I am very sorry for the mistake and I sincerely apologize for it. Regards, Amy J