Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (37978)	6/13/1999 7:53:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

as we can clearly see from the PR released on February 22, the company makes no claims about WebWyz. Black is the founding partner of Plug & Play Technologies,founder and Managing Director of WebWyz Technologies, Inc., 2-1/2 year old web development company, and founder and Managing Director of HealthWyz Technologies, Inc., #reply-10098216 This tout has made the claim that the company acquired WebWyz along with another entity on February 24th.... those additional shares have not been dumped on the market as far as I can determine. They were used to acquire WebWyz and deao.com etc. had to be!!! Otherwise HOW were those subsidiaries acquired?????????? ragingbull.com When in fact there were no subsidiaries acquired but he used this as a means to "calm" the outrage investors had upon learning that the O/S count, the FLOAT and the AUTHORIZED shares had taken an incredible leap [please note he posted this the day of the shareholders meeting.] His claim was supported by another tout buddy who went even further in his wild claims, announcing the amount PABN paid for these "acquisitions", saying..... this penny stock, since your last tizzy-fit, has acquired yet 3 more company, ALL for an additional 70 milllion shares! Does that register, Bob? deao.com webwyz.com And a bank that hasn't been formally announced yet? ragingbull.com well, now let's dissect the claims here.... we know that DEAO.com cannot have been "acquired" and shares paid for this purchase as this is a new creation of PABN. DEAO.com was just created and is currently under CONSTRUCTION!!! and WebWyz...well, that's already been pointed out as being a separate corporation. So, no payment of shares there. And lastly, the bank ...hahahahahaha If this is the thrift, then again. Horsehockey. How can you pay for something that doesn't exist? Another problem I see in these two making these claims [and repeating them], is that they did so on February 24th. They both declared that these acquisitions took place before the RM even happened between the two PABN's. So, I ask you, could these acquisitions have taken place? I've since asked his buddy about these 70Million shares that he claims the company paid for these "acquisitions" and he refuses to respond or clarify his statement.

To: jhild who wrote (37978)	6/13/1999 8:01:00 PM
From: PCModem	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

"...you needn't worry that he will come up with anything." Oh, but thank YOU for your utterly worthless contributions to the discussion. I mean why produce facts when you can misdirect and distract with your own musings and lies? "It looks like you are probably right that Webwyz belongs to Bill Black and probably his buddy David C. Price from his prior venture Plugnpay.com" Now, as I recall she did not say that in a public message. I'd have to guess that it must be from your private messages back and forth, you know the ones in which you plan your conspiracy to harass those who post here and mislead those who read this thread. Otherwise, just where did you come up with that idea that something she has not said she must be right about? Or did you just have an hallucination? Mental instability alert! Mental instability alert! "I think these kinds of disclosures are what they seek to avoid with the publication of any audited financials." They have not been avoiding anything since their announced plan to release the financials on or before June 30, 1999. They made that announcement over 4 months ago. So your "opinion" would be based on what facts? I don't think you are aware of just exactly what an "opinion" is: dictionary.com "Opinion \Opin"ion\, n. [F., from L. opinio. See Opine.] 1. That which is opined; a notion or conviction founded on probable evidence; belief stronger than impression, less strong than positive knowledge; settled judgment in regard to any point of knowledge or action. Opinion is when the assent of the understanding is so far gained by evidence of probability, that it rather inclines to one persussion than to another, yet not without a mixture of incertainty or doubting. --Sir M. Hale." You fail to meet the opinion definition on two counts -- It is not founded on probable evidence* and there is no hint of incertainty or doubting in what you say are your "opinions." However, your nonsense certainly does meet this criteria: ...less strong than positive knowledge... as your inability to provide any proof of your allegations establishes beyond anyone's doubt. You have been hiding behind the "opinion" cloak for too long. Your "opinions" are not "opinions" at all. Looks to me like that item in your wardrobe must have come from the emperor's yard sale...the one where he got rid of all his new clothes. It is really way past time for you to develop some new interests. Your obsession with this stock and these people is inappropriate. Your lies and misdirections are not "opinions" at all. The only story you are interested in is the one you create for your amusement at our expense. Enough is enough. PCM GO PABN!!!