To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4181 ) 6/19/1999 11:26:00 AM From: Scott C. Lemon Respond to of 12823
Hello Frank, > The following release has to do with Worldgate's picture in picture > (PIP) Hyperlinking capabilities. I'd be interested in hearing some > views on this, both technical and user related from an application > point of view. > > biz.yahoo.com I was just reading something that seems to be related to this product ... ATVEF ... atvef.com > Also, does anyone know if WGAT is still using Vertical Blanking > Interval, or VBI, exclusively, in their delivery of bit mapped (as > opposed to CGI, HTML, etc.) formats? That is, if, in fact they do > use VBI and bit-mapping/shotgunning, or ever have. I'd also like to > know what other bandwidth optimizing techniques they use on systems > that are not so constrained for bandwidth. From readind the ATVEF site, and docs, it appears that they *are* using VBI, but that they have developed a HTML format for their purposes. The set-top device is expected to then have a cache for the pages and other information, to be displayed at the appropriate time. > I suppose that if they are using bit mapped payloads, and VBI > optimization, then they could very easily deploy their systems over > cable operators' facilities that are currently (and simultaneously) > supporting either ATHM or RR. True or false? Yes ... it appears that this stuff will work ... even over broadcast television signals. It looks like the communications is only one way and that the channel simply sends the pages, to be cached, all the time. The user is then just "interactive" with their set-top box ... not all the way upstream. I'll have to read more in-depth ... > If someone here can do a brief primer on this company's approach, I > (and I am sure others) would appreciate it greatly. TIA. It appears that these guys are doing the same type of thing ... I'm trying to find more on the two-way/interactive questions ... > Regards, Frank Coluccio Scott C. Lemon