Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (61869)	6/15/1999 3:27:00 PM
From: DRBES	Respond to of 1572101

re: "I'd say you are having some REAL PERSONAL problems !" Nobody, of consequence, really thinks that your opinion on this issue is of any relevance; though on the issue of "REAL PERSONAL problems" you are very obviously the most experienced on this thread. DARBES

To: Paul Engel who wrote (61869)	6/15/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572101

Paul, re:<You reposted my comment - re-reposted above - and IT DOES NOT CONTAIN THE WORD "ONLY"> Your original post on K7 voltages on June 10: To: +fyo (61236 ) From: +Paul Engel Thursday, Jun 10 1999 12:46PM ET Reply #61264 of 61869 FYO - Re: "This also explains why the K7 uses 1.6V" According to AMD publications the K7 uses a 2.5 volt Vcc which is reduced on-chip to 1.6 volts FOR THE PLL CLOCK ONLY. Higher voltages are used to achieve faster speed when all else fails. That is why AMD is using HIGHER VOLTAGES in their higher speed parts - they could achieve them NO OTHER WAY. Paul do you still say I invented the word ONLY above or did you write it? Petz