SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (63151)6/15/1999 8:51:00 PM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
He has been rumoured as the next CEO all day long - on several boards.
Frankly it is nonsense to call it a "thankless job". It must be one of the plums. Not only is most of the hard work with the DEC/Tandem integration over, but the new man will become filthy rich in no time at all. Options granted at these levels will double in value within six months. House is not up to the job, in my opinion, and would be fortunate to be offered a 1st lieutenant role.

I don't buy the explanation for his leaving Nortel. Either he has got something lined up or he is being pushed. I would have thought if he had something lined up he would have announced it.



To: Boplicity who wrote (63151)6/15/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: Jeng Chiu  Respond to of 97611
 
I used to own BAY, and although House wasnt as bad as the previous east/west Bay combo, he wasnt that effective either. His first quarter after taking over the job produced great results. Then BAY floundered and lost even more market share to CSCO. When NT finally bought BAY, everyone, myself included was thoroughly relieved. NT shareholder's paid the price as most analysts panned the move. It took a couple of great quarters, big contracts, and a name change to finally move the stock up.

If youve ever seen David House on TV, he's a terrible communicator and always seems nervous. He doesnt exactly thrive under pressure. If youre goal is mediocrity, oftentimes, that's all you'll get.

This is not the man to lead CPQ...... just because we're down, doesnt mean we have to settle for an also-ran CEO.



To: Boplicity who wrote (63151)6/15/1999 10:23:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
Hey Greg,

Was your thinking this sharp also back in 1993 with Gerstner and IBM???

Regards,
John