Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC: BETTING, INC. A WAGER ON NEW GAMING TECHNOLOGY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorjenzak who wrote (2692)	6/16/1999 12:42:00 AM
From: Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2909

Hi Jorj., On the contria. Jorj.. This is not something that you have raised. This is something new. Read the News. This has nothing to do with wether one beleives in Tom or not. It has to do with business. It has to do with the ability of a shareholder being able to sell their shares. Getting a right price. For that matter getting a good price. When a company or individual controls the price of the stock, you get what they think you should get. NOT GOOD. What happens you remove the open market. BETT right now should be selling in the 1 range. Look at where it is at. The techs stink, the fundamentals are good. Ask yourself why??? Everytime this stock moves up, it is beaten down. Not because it is natural. This stock in all aspects should be right now at the 2-3 level based on the fundamentals alone. Ask yourself why????? BETT won't let it go there. It is becoming that maybe Tom has a hand in this and if I find out that this is being held down by the company, I will be the first to broadcast it. In capital letters. Let me remind you of this, everyone has an agenda. Tom is no exception. I created my thread so I can make these kinds of posts. Open for discovery and opinion. I try not to make these kinds of post on home posts because folks take them the wrong way. In most cases, post like this will put everyone on the defensive. No one will look. On my thread if I make this kind of post, hopefully folks will hunt and look to see if I am right or prove me wrong. That is why it is there. I'm looking for answers Jorj.. Give them to me. You've asked me before certain questions. Now you are getting part of the answer. Later, Ron

To: Jorjenzak who wrote (2692)	6/16/1999 9:17:00 AM
From: DaiTN	Respond to of 2909

Hi Jor, I agree and I am glad that you share my point of view. Let see what Tom say about this in 3 weeks. Dai

To: Jorjenzak who wrote (2692)	6/16/1999 11:39:00 AM
From: SCOOBEY-DO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2909

>>>I do not understand the dilution discussion Scoob posted about only new shares getting diluted?? Unless they are a new class, more shares means each share gets diluted some in value unless the value of the company increases at the same time proportionately.<<< This is the way I took that statement: Before Stock proceeds After Cash 0 6,200,000 6,200,000 Other Assets 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total Assets 3,000,000 6,200,000 9,200,000 Liabilities 4,000,000 4,000,000 Equity (1,000,000) 6,200,000 5,200,000 Liab&Equ. 3,000,000 6,200,000 9,200,000 After the stock sale, the net book value would be $5,200,000 divided by the shares outstanding including the new 10,000,000. The net book value would be positive. Before the stock sale, the current shareholders held a negative net book value in BETT. IMO The current shareholders gain NBV through the stock transaction, while the new shareholders' holdings are diluted due to the current negative equity in BETT. Let me know what you think. Scoobey

To: Jorjenzak who wrote (2692)	6/17/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2909

Hi Jorj., I think that your misunderstanding my question. I am not questioning Toms integrity. I think he is a straight shooter. What I'm questioning is his intentions as far as ET&T buying up another 2 mil. shares when he already has 52%. Is it to pump capital into e-connect???? Is it to take a bigger control over the company????? I mean what????? I brought this up at the meeting about the share structure. Got a satisfactory answer at the time and at that time there was nothing mentioned about his intentions to buy up 2 mil. more shares. All I would like to know is why????? Thats all. Ron