Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (62794)	6/16/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: Mark Fowler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Bought Amzn and Aol glenn at 102 each waiting for Yhoo maybe near 130 be good.

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (62794)	6/16/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: Tom D	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Glenn, please reference posts #62012 and #62507... ...before you give much of your limited time to KIS. I actually have these bookmarked, and every time I get really mad at KIS's postings, I intend to remind the thread about them. I can't decide which is my favorite. #62012 is such a delight, especially the following... <<The carnage in the internuts is just beginning. ALL of them are going to lose 90% of their value within 1 month.>> But #62507 is probably the real hall of famer, since it exposes KIS as a Clintonesque liar, all for the pupose of seeking some little ego trip on a financial chat group thread. Once you referred to me as a gentleman in a posting. I don't feel like one as I write this. But somewhere, someway, somehow, somebody needs to get a message to KIS that it is truly obnoxious to repeatedly clog up a thread with a bunch of bullsh*t lies. Tom D

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (62794)	6/16/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Glenn, please do not let your staggering losses cloud your judgement when spewing personal attacks. BTW- using excessively large words in your carefully worded statement does _not_ impress me, since that was clearly the point of your efforts. The FCC chairman has power. He indicated he doesn't believe the lower court's ruling was correct. He has the influence to have the matter brought up again in another hearing, which was clearly the thrust of his statements. If you are unable to understand this, i'm afraid there's nothing I can do to help you. ----------- You need some help Let me know if you need further explanation on this issue. I am willing to help those with reading comprehension disabilities at no charge as long as that person makes a personal effort too. Glenn